Bells Freed From 'Naked' DSL

Status
Not open for further replies.

John121

Yellow Belt
March 28, 2005
Bells Freed From 'Naked' DSL
By Roy Mark


Federal telecommunications laws do not require BellSouth and other regional carriers to offer standalone DSL service, according to a decision released Friday by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

The ruling, the last major decision of the Michael Powell era at the FCC, upholds BellSouth's decision to bundle DSL broadband with its voice service. The decision pre-empts rulings by Georgia, Florida and several other states requiring BellSouth to offer standalone, or "naked" DSL, to end users who choose to use rival voice services.

"We find that each of the state commission decisions at issue here -- either expressly or implicitly -- conditions the terms on which BellSouth must offer competitive LECs [local exchange carriers] unbundled access to its local loops in a manner inconsistent with the 1996 [Telecommunications] Act and our implementing regulations," the FCC decision states. "State requirements that impose on BellSouth a requirement to unbundled  do exactly what the commission expressly determined was not required by the act."

The traditional regional telecommunications companies are increasingly losing landline customers to rival local companies, wireless services and Internet telephony. In an effort to staunch the losses, the Bells want to force users of its DSL to also use its landline voice services.

Not surprisingly, BellSouth (Quote, Chart) applauded the FCC decision.

"This FCC order continues progress on clearing out regulatory underbrush that handicaps rolling out broadband," Jonathan Banks, vice president for federal executive and regulatory affairs at BellSouth, said in a statement. "By affirming a single national policy in this area, this FCC action will increase the speed and efficiency of bringing to consumers new and innovative broadband service offerings over wireline networks."

Democrats Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein voted against the measure, saying the FCC was responding to state efforts to force the Bells to unbundled its DSL service with the "heavy hammer of pre-emption."

In a joint statement issued by Copps and Adelstein, the two commissioners said, "In this decision, the commission unwisely flashes the green light for broadband tying arrangements. Because we believe this is an area where the commission should proceed with caution, we cannot support the outcome."

Copps and Adelstein called the decision a "slap to federal-state relations" and said the vote creates an "ominous" precedent for consumers.

"If it is permissible to deny consumers DSL if they do not also order analog voice service, what stops a carrier from denying broadband service to an end-user who has cut the cord and uses only a wireless phone?" they wrote. "What prevents a carrier from refusing to provide DSL service to a savvy consumer who wants standalone broadband only for VoIP?"

None of the three commissioners voting for BellSouth issued a statement.
 

myshtern

Yellow Belt
Good

On a side note - Qwest can go to hell
If anyone is interested in DSL or any service whatsoever, DO NOT USE QWEST!
 

John121

Yellow Belt
Yea. I read one of your other threads saying that you have Qwest and that it is 256K up and down. LOL. Just be glad you have that. Anything is better than 56k. ;D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top